A single AI can fabricate citations. The standard fix is to verify everything—but that's expensive. The cheaper fix: ask multiple AIs the same question and treat their disagreement as the prioritized verification list. CouncilMind does this in one query.
The controlling case is X v. Y (2019). The court found that...
X v. Y is right, but Z v. W (2023) modified the holding—the cited principle is now subject to a narrower test.
Synthesis: X v. Y states the rule; Z v. W (2023) is the operative test. Both must be cited.
Hallucinated citations are the #1 AI legal risk
Multiple independent models citing the same case is a much stronger signal than one model citing it.
When models disagree on the controlling rule, that's exactly the case to pull and verify.
Run any answer through an opposing-counsel persona to find the strongest counter-argument.
Built around verification, not trust
Doctrine, procedure, drafting, brief framing—anything.
Each cites independently. Disagreements surface immediately.
The disagreement list is your verification queue. Pull only those cases.
Free tier included. NOT legal advice—always verify.